In apparel, color is the most apparent design element and one that makes or breaks a customer’s decision to buy. Wile many of us do find ourselves in awe of the color but few think about all the hours, effort, and work that precedes it.
In this age of technology, many apparel brands still rely on subjective methods of color approval. While it may serve the purpose but it’s a predicament waiting to happen.
You want to know why?
If the production batch does not match the approved color standard, the brand will have to recall an entire seasonal line.
A discrepancy that can result in hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost sales and rework costs. In Europe, the returned and unsold textiles are a major pressure point in the circular economy.
Let us uncover why color inaccuracy leads to errors, delays, and high costs. Also, why brands need a digital color management solution like ColordesQ to reduce risks, save money, and streamline their workflows.
The Color Evaluation and Approval Process
According to Textile World, ensuring color accuracy and supply chain efficiency are key to establishing a strong brand.
However, from color concept to a production-ready garment, the procedure is far from simple. It involves base materials, dyeing lab dips, testing under light sources, and aligning color perception across design teams and suppliers. Apart from the artistic vision, achieving apparel color accuracy depends on precision, collaboration, and speed.
Let us first know about the elements
Color Standard:
It is a predefined reference used by brands to communicate the exact color they want for a fabric or product. It serves as the “target” color that suppliers must match during dyeing and production.
Season:
In fashion, a collection cycle (e.g., Spring/Summer or Fall/Winter) is essential to determine and drive color palettes, trends, and launch timelines.
Lap Dip:
A small swatch of fabric dyed to match a desired color standard. It is submitted by the supplier for approval before bulk production.
Batch/Lot:
A specific group of materials or garments produced under the same dyeing or manufacturing conditions that have consistent color.
.png)
The color evaluation and approval process begins with selecting a target color. It is then followed by lab dip submissions from suppliers or dye houses. The lab dips are visually assessed against the brand’s color standard. Often the assessment is done under multiple light sources to check for acceptable tolerances.
If the lap dip does not match, it's sent back with comments, and a new attempt is done by the supplier. This loop will be repeated multiple times but depends on the material, dye lot, or communication clarity. The visual assessments bring subjectivity while physical sample shipments back and forth cause delays and costs.
In today’s -sensitive apparel industry, brands no longer have the luxury of . The color approval process — often overlooked — is now a potential bottleneck. Any delay here can lead to missed launch windows, excess costs, and loss of competitive edge.-
The Hidden and Apparent Costs of Color Inaccuracy
In today’s fast-paced, and tariff trend-business the apparel supply chains are complex. First the materials and fabrics are sourced from different sources and respond differently to dyes. Second, production happens across multiple regions, amid different lighting conditions, calibration, and machinery.
For brands, achieving consistent and accurate color under these conditions is incredibly difficult. There is little room for drawn-out approval cycles, costly re-dyeing, or mismatched bulk production. According to estimates, 12–40% of clothing ends up unsold at season end, which compounds losses along with return-related losses.
The cost of inaccuracy is not only high, but it ripples across production, inventory, and brand trust.
Here is breakdown of the costs that brands incur
a. Rework / Re-dye Costs
When bulk production does not match the approved sample, brands have to re-dye, rework, and even scrap entire lots. This results in wasted fabric, chemicals, labor, and time which lowers the margins. Apparel dyeing and finishing causes 3% of carbon emissions and with the consumption rising, the number will considerably increase. Rework only makes it worse, and if the garments are rejected entirely, it leads to even bigger financial loss.
b. Increased Approval Cycles and Delays
Color approvals are often based on visual assessments that are subjective, inconsistent, and prone to error. The result is multiple lab-dip cycles and back-and-forth sample sharing between the brand and supplier. Subsequently, every extra cycle adds days or even weeks that delays product launch and squeezes the seasonal calendar.
c. Sample Shipment and Logistics Costs
Physical samples are shipped for evaluation, but it costs courier fees, customs, packaging. These may seem small, but they do add up. Also, when you are looking at hundreds of colorways across seasons, it accounts to tens of thousands of dollars spent on just shipping lab dips.
d. Inventory and Waste Risk
Off-tone garments are flagged too late at the end of production or even after retail launch. This leads to unsellable stock, markdowns, or customer returns. Furthermore, in the e-commerce age, buyers expect what they see, and even slight color mismatches result in returns. This not only impacts the bottom line, but negative reviews and bad social media buzz also affects brand’s reputation.
e. Opportunity Cost and Speed-to-Market
Time spent on fixing color issues means not enough time for launching new SKUs, exploring trends, or hitting early-season shelves. Brands that cannot manage color accurately and quickly lose competition and market share to rivals.
Introducing ColordesQ: A Digital Color Solution
ColordesQ by Triple Tree Solutions is an end-to-end digital color management system designed specifically for the textile and apparel industry. The goal is to allow brands and suppliers to communicate, evaluate, and manage apparel color in real time.
The traditional color workflows are based on visual judgment. Conversely, ColordesQ provides objective spectral data, centralized color libraries, and an intuitive digital platform to ensure color accuracy and consistency.
Here is why it regarded as the best digital color management software for textiles
- Reduce lab-dip cycles and approval times
- Eliminate physical sample shipments
- Ensure color consistency across suppliers and seasons
- Save costs, reduce waste, and accelerate time-to-market
ColordesQ is not just a color quality control software but a complete tool to manage apparel color from design to lab dip and production.
Key Features of ColordesQ and How It Mitigates the Costs
To address the many hidden and visible costs of color inaccuracy, ColordesQ offers a robust set of digital features. Each feature is developed to streamline textile color matching and reduce errors from concept to production.
Let us see how ColordesQ helps lower cost considerably
Spectral Data and Objective Color Evaluation
ColordesQ replaces subjective visual matching with spectral measurements that removes human bias. The biggest benefit is tackling the issue of metamerism
It provides:
- Accurate delta (ΔE) values for precision matching
- Illuminant checks under different light conditions (e.g., D65, TL84)
- Visual and numerical side-by-side comparisons
The spectral data significantly reduces errors and first-sample rejections. Moreover, it improves first hit rates and minimizes rework.
Digital Color Workflow / Approval Process
The biggest cost comes from physical sample sharing between brands and suppliers. With ColordesQ, all the lab-dip submissions and bulk approvals are done online.
- Job creation, evaluations, comments, and approvals in one platform
- Rule-based auto-approvals for samples within tolerance
- Up to 70% faster color development cycles and far fewer communication errors.
The result?
Before: Physical sample shipping= 17 days and $92 cost
After: With ColordesQ= 6 days and $2.95
Centralized Color Library
As a premier digital color management software, ColordesQ supports .QTX files and custom libraries. The purpose is to allow all design team and suppliers to follow and reference the same color standards.
- Shared libraries ensure consistency across seasons and suppliers
- Easy comparison across substrates, styles, and timeframes
- Track which material/color combinations have succeeded historically
With current and previous colors all stored in the library, brands can prevent confusion and minimize variation from supplier to supplier.
Analytics, Reporting and Supplier Performance Tracking
With advanced dashboards and reports, the textile color quality tool delivers data-driven visibility.
Brands can
- Track first-hit rates, approval cycle times, and supplier performance
- Identify recurring issues by material, process, or geography
- Instantly communicate, leave comments, and get response
- Monitor compliance and establish continuous improvement goals
Brands can finally make informed decisions rather than reacting to issues after the fact.
Sustainability and Cost Reduction
A recent study stated a 24.4% online apparel return rate which translates to almost $38 billion. Brands also have to manage the waste which further rises the cost. ColordesQ is one apparel color software that has positive impact on both sustainability and cost.
- Up to 80% savings on courier costs (by avoiding physical shipments)
- Fewer lab-dip cycles = less dye use, less fabric waste
- Significantly reduced carbon footprint across development
According to client testimonials, ColordesQ has cut lab-dip lead times by 23 days and reduced carbon impact by 85%.
Learn More: The Future of Color Matching in Textile and Why ColordesQ Essential
Final Thoughts
Color may seem like a surface-level concern. However, in the apparel industry, color inaccuracy has deep and compounding costs. The impact ranges from financial losses and operational delays to less time to market and customer dissatisfaction.
The traditional method involving visual assessments, shipping physical samples, and rework — no longer fits in today’s fast-paced, digitally driven industry. Also, with shrinking profit margins due to tariffs, brands cannot afford costs that hit the bottom line.
ColordesQ offers a smarter, faster, and more accurate apparel color management solution. It prvides objective spectral evaluation, streamlined digital workflows, and actionable analytics. Brands can streamline their color processes to high inaccuracy cost, cut waste, and improve efficiency.
If color consistency matters to your brand and it should, it’s time to digitize and modernize your color management process.
Explore how ColordesQ can Transform your Apparel Color Workflow.